2018 (3) TMI 1068
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ocate. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, who appears for the respondents, accepts notice. 1.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the issue which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11241/2017, titled: Tilokchand Manaklal Kothari vs UOI. This asp....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ing companies, which are active and functional. Petitioner No.1 1. Reddy Biotech Limited. 2. Reddy Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. 3. Reo Remedies Pvt. Ltd. 4. CKG Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. 5. M. Sea Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Petitioner No.2 1. Reddy Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. 3.1. Counsel for the petitioners says that since petitioners' names were i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s contained in Tilokchand Manaklal Kothari (supra). It is made clear that the directives contained therein will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 4.1 The petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of Section 248 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 4.2 In order to fac....
TaxTMI