2018 (3) TMI 538
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Petitioner Mr. Swapnil Bangur a/w Shalaka A. Gujar Karande for Respondent ORDER P. C. We have heard on earlier occasion Mr. Prakash Shah and today Mr. Sridharan, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Bangur appearing for the Respondents. 2 There is an affidavit-in-reply filed in terms of our earlier directions. Mr. Sridharan, on instructions, states that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....then amount of Rs. 5,07,59,409/included in eight Rebate orders sanctioned by Deputy Commissioner (Rebate) that is already with the Petitioner gets approval of Revision Authority and no further action will be taken by the department for recovery of said amount. However, if the Petitioner fails then the Petitioner is required to pay Rs. 5,07,59,409/to the department and claim equivalent amount as cr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mposing costs of Rs. 25,000/on the Respondents and which has been duly complied with. It was not an order passed merely because the Court was upset with the Respondents or because of the absence of the advocates, but it is clear from the order that it was to impress upon the Authorities that the proceedings before this Court should not be delayed. 5 By delay, the larger Public Interest suffers ....
TaxTMI