2018 (3) TMI 461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri R. Subramaniyam, AC (AR) - for the Respondent. ORDER The above application for condonation of delay is filed by the appellant seeking to condone the delay of 860 days in preferring the appeal. 2. On behalf of the appellant, the Ld. Counsel, Shri Sathish Sunder reiterated the grounds stated in the application. He submitted that it came to the knowledge of the appellant that the pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. AR opposed the application. He submitted that there is negligence and willful laches on the part of the appellant for which the delay has occurred. The appellant was aware of the proceedings pending before the Commissioner (Appeals). The impugned order was passed in 2014 and the same has been despatched to the appellant vide speed post on 08.09.2014. This being so, the appellant cannot turn aro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....seen filed along with the appeal. In this affidavit, the Director has sworn that there was restructuring/reorganizing the company and there was chaos with regard to books of accounts as they remained unreconciled. That only after completion of reorganization, it came to the notice of the company that an amount of Rs. 3,58,253 being the refund claim pertaining to the appeal remain unreconciled. On ....