2018 (2) TMI 1606

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant (s) Shri Rajeev Ranjan (Joint Commr.) (A.R.) & Shri Mohd Altaf (Asstt. Commr.) (A.R.) - for the Revenue ORDER Per: Shri Ashok Jindal The appellant in appeal against the impugned order where duty has been demanded by denying the benefit of Notification No.30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is manufacturing and clearing Canvass a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntical issue came up before this Tribunal in the case of J.S. Fabrics v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur [2014 (307) E.L.T. 784 (Tri.-Del.)], wherein the Tribunal observed as under:- "5. We have considered the submissions from both the sides and perused the records. The only point of dispute in this case is as to whether the canvas canopies specially designed for lorries, tool bags and w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sacks of all kind for packing of goods for transport, storage, sale etc. Since both of these items are covered by Chapter 63, the same would be exempt from duty under Notification No.30/2004-C.E., as no input duty Cenvat credit has been availed. 7. As regards the canvas canopies specially designed for lorries, we find that these canopies made from canvas tarpaulin, are basically the tarpaulins ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etc.) also fall in this heading provided they are flat. The canvas Tarpaulins, in question, are specially shaped for different model of lorries and though the Department's contention is that the same are not flat, no evidence in this regard has been produced. In our view, therefore, these Tarpaulin would be correctly classifiable under heading 6306 and not as 'parts or accessories of motor vehicle....