2017 (2) TMI 1323

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p; Respondents: (By Sri T. K. Veda Murthy, AGA)   ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court with a limited prayer that respondent No.1, the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit & Recovery), should be directed to pass the necessary rectification order under Section 69(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax, Act, 2003. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the petitioner ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had passed reassessment order dated 17.3.2010, for the tax period 2007-08 and 2008-09. Since the petitioner was aggrieved by the re-assessment order, it filed appeals before the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals). The said appeal was partially allowed by the order date d 23.2.2013. 3. Thereafter, the petitioner filed second appeals before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. By order ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y a partial rebate for the value of rice bran. 5. Since the petitioner wanted a rectification order, on 18.8.2016, it filed an application under Section 69 of the Act. However, despite the lapse of six months, the rectification application is yet to elicit any response by respondent No.1. Hence, this petition before this Court. 6. Mr. T. N. Keshava Murthy, the learned counsel for the petitioner....