2017 (2) TMI 1323

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Keshava Murthy T. N., Advocate)   Respondents: (By Sri T. K. Veda Murthy, AGA)   ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court with a limited prayer that respondent No.1, the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit & Recovery), should be directed to pass the necessary rectification order under Section 69(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax, Act, 2003. 2. Briefly th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit & Recovery), had passed reassessment order dated 17.3.2010, for the tax period 2007-08 and 2008-09. Since the petitioner was aggrieved by the re-assessment order, it filed appeals before the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals). The said appeal was partially allowed by the order date d 23.2.2013. 3. Thereafter, the petitioner filed second appeals be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... input rebate, still the respondent No.1 allowed only a partial rebate for the value of rice bran. 5. Since the petitioner wanted a rectification order, on 18.8.2016, it filed an application under Section 69 of the Act. However, despite the lapse of six months, the rectification application is yet to elicit any response by respondent No.1. Hence, this petition before this Court. 6. Mr. T.....