2018 (2) TMI 1317

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amesh For the Respondents : Mr. A. P. Srinivas ORDER Heard Mr.T.Ramesh the learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, challenging the order passed by the first respondent/Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission (for short, Settlement Commission) rejecting....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and accept the entire duty amount demanded in the show cause notice. The Settlement Commission, while rejecting the application, by the impugned order, did not allow the application to be proceeded with, in terms of Section 32 F (1) of the Act, as the petitioner did not satisfy the condition in Clause (a) of Section 32 E (1) (a). The said condition being that, the applicant should have filed retu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e plan and the photostat copy of the partnership deed. In response to the said report, the Superintendent of Central Excise, by a reply, dated 08.12.2000, stated as follows:- "Please refer to your letter, dated 30.03.1999, submitted along with the application for R.T. It is noticed that you have taken out the licence No.5/99, dated 05.04.1999 to do the processing of dyeing of ble....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....there was no processing of dyeing blended yarn in the last year, so, they did not file 173 B during that period, and in future, they will commence processing of blended yearn and they will file 173 B return. The petitioner specifically mentioned that they are doing job work, i.e., 100% polyester yarn to M/s Kousalya Thread Mills, Tiruppur, under Rule 57 F (4) transactions and apart from that, they....