2018 (2) TMI 1233

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order for seeking certain relief on merits as per the impugned order. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed declaration under VCES Scheme 2013 wherein declared service tax payable amounting to Rs. 1,43,685/-. Initially the said declaration was accepted. Later on, it was found that the appellant has not correctly declared u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....duced and when the penalty under Section 77 (2) for non registration has already been imposed, therefore, no penalty under Section 70 of the Act is imposable for late fees. 3. Heard the parties and considered the submissions. 4. After hearing both sides, I find that the appellant has sought three reliefs against the impugned order:- (A) The demand for the period beyond the five years is n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....from the total demand and the penalty is also modify, therefore, penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 is reduced:- (c) I find that in the impugned order, the penalty under Section 77 (2) of the Act has been imposed for non-registration and further penalty under Section 70 has been imposed for less payment of service tax. Admittedly when the appellant was not registered with the ser....