2018 (2) TMI 724

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Vaish, (CA), for Appellant Shri Mohd. Altaf, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for Respondent Per: Archana Wadhwa The demand of Service tax to the extent of Rs. 67,20,597/- stands confirmed against the appellant under the category of 'Construction of Residential Complex Services' for the period 05/06/2005 to 31/03/2009, by comparing the ST-3 Returns figures with the Profit & Loss Account figur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x amount of Rs. 67,20,597/- along with interest and penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Aggrieved by the order the appellants have filed this appeal. 2. The Counsel for appellants submits the following main reasons for the difference in figures in profit and loss account and the figure in ST-3 return: (i) Appellants have undertaken several housing projects and have s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o 31/03/2009. 3. Learned CA for the appellants submits that on account of the above reasons, there is bound to be difference in the value of the services as reflected by them in the ST-3 Returns as also Profit & Loss Account. Learned CA also submits that though they were registered with the Service Tax Department and were paying Service Tax under the category of 'Construction of Residential Com....