2017 (3) TMI 1622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dharan, AC (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - Ld. counsel for the appellant says that even though there were several disputes in the course of adjudication, that is reduced to following three : (i)      Whether the appellant cleared manufactured goods in the guise of bought out items during the period from 1995-96 to 1999-2000. (ii)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o appellant wherever he found traded goods matched with the sale invoices. Such piecemeal approach to levy duty on some of the traded goods is impermissible in law. 3. So far as packing charges in issue (ii) above is concerned, which were added to the assessable value of the goods, that it is not includible for no good reason stated by ld. Adjudicating Authority. 4. So far as removal o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s, adjudication fails to sustain. In absence of evidence to support the allegation of Revenue, appellant succeeds. 7. So far as packing charges are concerned, there is no material to repel the reasoning given by the adjudicating authority which was concurred by the appellate authority to hold that those packing were primary for removal of goods. Therefore there is no scope for appellant to s....