2018 (2) TMI 195

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Bipin Kumar Pandey For the Respondent : C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.  ORDER Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri C.B. Tripathi, special counsel for the respondents no. 1, 3 and 4 and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of seizure dated 11.01.2018 alleged to have been passed under Section 129(1) of the U....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST) the provisions of Central G.S.T. Act apply mutatis mutandis. Since analogous provisions like Section 129(1) of the U.P.G.S.T. Act exist in the Central G.S.T. Act as well, the order of seizure is not illegal or without jurisdiction. The U.P.G.S.T. Act makes provision for levy and collection of tax on intrastate supply of goods or services or both i.e. relating to tran....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Section 129 of the U.P. G.S.T. Act. In view of above, the impugned order of seizure cannot be held to be bad in law only for the reason that the wrong provision of Act has been mentioned while passing the same as the power of seizure is clearly traceable under the relevant Act as well. Accordingly, we are of the view that the impugned order is to be treated to have been passed under IGST Act r....