Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (1) TMI 1136

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Petitioners : Sri Nishit Kumar Shetty, Adv. Order]. -  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the records. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has strenuously argued before this Court that the cognizance taken against the accused persons 1 to 3 u/ s. 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is bad in law, because Section 83 of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ake cognizance of such provision. Even Section 14 of the Central Excise Act is tices with not a penal provision which only prescribes the procedure for summoning a witin an in- ness. Section 14 of the Central Excise Act says that it is empowered to summon pliance of persons to give evidence and to produce document in the inquiry. Therefore, the long with alleged order of taking cognizance under th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce, I pass the following order : 5. The petition is disposed of. The order dated 21-4-2016 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Mangaluru, in PC No. 16/2016 in taking cognizance under the above said provisions is hereby quashed. However, the matter is restored on to the file of the Trial Court to pass appropriate orders in PC No. 16/2016 after going through the contents of the comp....