Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (9) TMI 51

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is directed against the order dated October 4, 2002, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "SMC-II, New Delhi (for short "the Tribunal"), in I.T.A. No. 998/Delhi of 1998. By the impugned order the Tribunal has deleted the penalty levied on the respondent-assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, in respect of the asses....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had surrendered an income of Rs. 4.25 lakhs. Thus, the submission is that the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer, as contemplated in section 271(1)(c) of the Act was inherent in the queries raised by him during the course of the assessment proceedings. It is urged that the Assessing Officer had directed the issue of notice for levy of penalty under the said section after being satisfied that t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n D.M. Manasvi v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 557, 562 and CIT v. S.V. Angidi Chettiar [1962] 44 ITR 739, 745 has observed thus: "A bare reading of the provisions of section 271 and the law laid down by the Supreme Court makes it clear that it is the assessing authority which has to form its own opinion and record its satisfaction before initiating the penalty proceedings. Merely because the penalty proc....