Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (11) TMI 53

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....JAYASIMHA BABU J. -The question that requires our consideration is as to whether the Tribunal is correct in deleting the disallowance of contribution made to the employees benefit fund. The assessment years are 1982-83, 1983-84 and 1984-85. The employees benefit fund to which the employer made the contribution had been established for providing educational facility to the children of the member....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the view of the Tribunal is erroneous as what is allowed under section 40A(10) is the amount of expenditure incurred from the fund in a case where the fund is established before March 1, 1984, and that provision does not permit deduction of the amount of the contribution made by the employer to that fund. His further submission was that such contribution is not allowable under any other provi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... contribution made by the employer to the fund is correct. The Tribunal in this case has followed an order made by it in an earlier case of the same assessee in respect of an earlier assessment year. It was not the stand of the Revenue that an amount corresponding to the contribution made by the employer had not been expended from the fund to which the contribution was made. The attention of the p....