2003 (12) TMI 654

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri V. Valte, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - The appellant, as a small-scale unit, engaged in the manufacture of brass parts which are liable to central excise duty under Chapters 74, 83, 84, 87 etc. As a small-scale unit, they are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 1/93, dated 28-2-93. 2. During the manufacture of parts, certain....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rders. 3. Submission of the appellants is that since they are reconverting the waste and scrap into original metal, though at another manufacturer's premises under Rule 57F(5) of Central Excise Rules, 1944, the value of the scrap so used should be treated as excludible under Explanation 6 of the Notification No. 1/93. The appellants have also relied on several decisions in support of their....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the case be treated only as one of captive consumption by the appellant. It is their submission that mere carrying out of some process outside the factory should not lead to loss of a benefit rightly entitled to the appellant. Appellant's submission is that exemption Notification should be read in its entirety and considered as a whole and in a manner so as serve its object and purpose as held by ....