Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (9) TMI 13

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. On the application filed under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (for short "the Tribunal"), referred the following question for our opinion: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that M/s. Hazarimal Milapchand Soorana and M/s. Ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed them separate registration number treating them as genuine; even separate registration under the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been granted to the firm, Mannalal Nirmal Kumar Soorana and Company. There cannot be two views unless a partnership firm is genuine, no registration can be granted. Subsequently, the registration has been withdrawn but in that year also the Tribunal gave a direction to gran....