2017 (11) TMI 1483

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. Sunil Bhandari For the Respondent : Mr. Anjay Kothari ORDER 1. By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the impugned judgment and order of the Tribunal allowing the appeal preferred by the assessee and dismissing the appeal preferred by the Department against the order of CIT(A). 2. This Court while admitting the appeal on 25.07.2007 framed th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT was legally justified in allowing benefit of telescoping/set off without properly taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and appreciating the law applicable? 3. Counsel for the appellant has specifically contended that the third member while deciding the matter on the ground of limitation under Section ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....proached the tribunal, the case became time barred and therefore, the assessment order has attained finality. 5. Counsel for the respondent has contended that the matter is squarely covered by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.49/2003 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur Vs. M/s.Somani Industries, A-85, Road NO.9, VKI Area, Jaipur decided on 03.0....