2017 (11) TMI 1342

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent ORDER The appeal is against order dt. 24.3.2009 of Commissioner (Appeals), Trichy. 2.   The ld. counsel for the appellant submitted that the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed their appeal for non-compliance of predeposit in terms of Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962. The first appellate authority ordered for predeposit of Rs. 32 lakhs which is more than 50% of the adjudicated duty ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....4.   After the issue of final anti-dumping duty notification dt. 24.7.2007, the Revenue entertained a view that anti-dumping duty based on final notification is liable to be paid by the appellant in respect of all consignments imported by them during the operation of provisional anti-dumping duty notification. Accordingly, the original authority confirmed a duty demand of Rs. 63,52,202/-....