2017 (11) TMI 899
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ari, FCA ORDER Per Bench These are 5 appeals preferred by the revenue against the order of Ld. CIT(A) dated 28.06.2016 for AYs. 2007-08 to 2011-12. The sole issue in these five appeals is identical with variance in figures which is extracted below for ready reference: AY: 2007-08 "Substantial point of law is not involved in this case but the overall tax effect is Rs. 49,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ax effect is Rs. 34,78,731/- which is above the threshold limit specified in the circular vide 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015. Hence, further appeal in this case is suggested. " AY: 2011-12 "Substantial point of law is not involved in this case but the overall tax effect is Rs. 55,26,750/- which is above the threshold limit specified in the circular vide 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015. Hence....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ven to file any revised grounds. In such a scenario, we have no other alternative but to dismiss the appeal preferred by the revenue. On merits, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has brought to our notice that the Ld. CIT(A) called for the remand report wherein the AO in the remand report has accepted after due verification the existence and creditworthiness of the companies which has advanced amou....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI