Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (12) TMI 73

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of this court: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that no penalty under section 271(1)(c) was leviable in respect of the trading addition of Rs. 18,446?" The reference relates to the assessment year 1979-80. The facts giving rise to the present reference are that the res....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act and after hearing the respondent, he imposed a sum of Rs. 20,000 as penalty. The order was sustained by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to the extent of Rs. 6,822. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the Revenue preferred an appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has dismissed the appeal. We have heard Sri Shambhu Chopra, learned standing coun....