Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (11) TMI 1488

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e allegations in the said show cause notice were that the finished goods namely M.S. Angles, M.S. Bars, TMT Bars and M.S. Missrolls were proposed to be confiscated under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. There was also a proposal to demand Central Excise duty of Rs. 11,30,006/- under proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 on short found finished goods and also a proposal to impose penalty on M/s. Anjani Steels (P) Ltd. under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944. There was also proposal to impose penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 on Shri Prem Chandra Sinha and Shri Sanjay Kumar, Director. The officers of the Central Excise visited the manufacturing unit on 17-8-2007. As per show c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y they filed representation to the Commissioner, Central Excise on 20th August, 2007. They further submitted that the confiscation of the goods cannot be based on evidence which are not sound. The Original Authority did not appreciate the submission before him and ordered the confiscation of seized finished goods. He imposed penalty of Rs. 10 lacs on M/s. Anjani Steels Ltd. and confirmed the demand of Rs. 11,30,006/-. He imposed equal penalty on M/s. Anjani Steels Ltd. under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944. He further imposed penalty of Rs. 2 lacs on Shri Sanjay Kumar, Director and Rs. 1 lac on Shri Prem Chandra Sinha under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 through Order-in-Original No. MP(Dem-13/2008)07 of 2009, dated 29-1-200....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....timated" is struck off. On next page of statement at four places "estimated physical verification" is manipulated to "physical verification" by sticking off of word "estimated". He has urged that initially it was stated that as estimated physical verification, raw material and finished goods whereas subsequently "estimated" was struck off as a result the statement appears to be physical verification of finished goods and raw material. Further, in reply to Question 5 the phrase estimated physical verification was not manipulated and remained as such. 4. Learned AR has submitted a copy of letter dated 10-5-2016 received from Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise, Allahabad wherein there is a chart showing stock verification report as....