Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (11) TMI 66

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....APRE J.- The decision rendered in this appeal shall govern disposal of other connected appeals being W.T.A. Nos. 85, 86, 87 and 88 of 2004 because it involves a common question and secondly, all these appeals relate to the same assessee. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Wealth-tax) under section 27A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, against an order dated December 23, 2003, pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....presentative. In view of the concession made by the learned Authorised Representative, we set aside the orders of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax (Appeals) and direct the Assessing Officer to value the plot at Rs. 18 per sq. ft. in the assessment year 1987-88 and thereafter make increase of 71/2 per cent, for appreciation in the later years." It is against this finding, the Revenue has come up i....