Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2017 (11) TMI 464

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Shikhar Garg and Mr. Prashant Maherchandani, Advs S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. (OPEN COURT) CM No. 39550/2017 (condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Application is disposed of. ITA 935/2017 1. The Revenue's appeal urges that the impugned order to the extent it excluded three comparables in ALP determination, of the assessee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 6,55,34,938/-. The DRP to which the assessee appealed, deleted 7 comparables and at the same time included 7 more. After giving effect to the DRP's direction, final adjustments of RS. 3,87,54,545/- was made by the AO. 5. Being aggrieved the assessee filed an appeal challenging inclusion of 3 comparables i.e. Ashok Leyland Projects Services Ltd., Kitco Ltd. and Mitcon Consultancy & Engineerin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ices. Besides it is also engaged in diversified activities such as training and engaging in laboratories and research etc. 8. We have heard the counsel for the Revenue who urges that the rationale for exclusion of three comparables which were high income entities is unpersuasive. 9. This Court is of the opinion that the rationale that Ashok Leyland was deriving major part of its revenue from win....