2014 (9) TMI 1130
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Antani, AGP for respondent ORAL ORDER 1. Heard Mr.Dharmesh Gurjar, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr.D.S.Vasavada, learned advocate for the respondents No.1 and 3, and Mr.Shirish Joshi, learned advocate for respondent No.2. 2. Challenge in this petition is made to the interlocutory order passed by the Industrial Court, Ahmedabad dated 16.06.2014 on Application Exh.2 in Appeal (TU) No.1 o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ted in the said order. The said order of the Industrial Court is challenged in this petition by one of the member of the Union contending that, the order passed by the Deputy Registrar of the Trade Unions was not required to be interfered with by the Industrial Court. 4. Heard Mr. Dharmesh Gurjar, learned advocate for the petitioner. He has mainly supported the order passed by the Deputy Registra....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ndents, have submitted that, the impugned order passed by the Industrial Court be not interfered with. It is submitted that the cancellation of the registration of the Union is already stayed by the Industrial Court, and for this purpose, attention of this Court is invited to the discussion and finding recorded in the impugned order, just above the operating part, wherein the implementation of the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... having gone through the material on record, this Court finds that, the matter is large open before the Industrial Court. The Court below has already directed to hold fresh election and for that, even modalities are worked out in the impugned order. While doing so, the order passed by the Deputy Registrar of the Trade Unions dated 26.02.2014 is already suspended, which is evident from record also.....