2017 (11) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner Mr. Pradeep Joshi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondents ORDER K.M. Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner has purported to file this revision petition under Section 55 of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Petitioner calls in question the order passed by the Tribunal. 2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd is now for Rs. 3,50,000/- and the amount is directed to be deposited in cash or by way of demand draft. It is feeling aggrieved by the said order that the petitioner is before us. 3. We heard Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents. 4. The following questions of law has been framed in the memo of r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Service Tax Act; the goods had been ordered by various individuals online; the goods were being transported on behalf of the logistic company and the goods have already suffered tax under the Central Sales Tax and there is no liability to tax under the Act. He would also submit that under the proviso to Section 48, petitioner is not mulcted with the liability to carry Form-16, which, undoubtedly,....