2017 (10) TMI 440

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Riyaz I. Chagla, JJ. Mr.Pradeep S. Jetlya/w Mr.J.B.Mishra for theappellant in both the appeals. None for the respondent ORDER P. C. 1 It is pointed out that the decision of the Tribunal relied upon in paragraph 6 has not become final in the sense that appeals preferred against the said decision have been admitted for final hearing. One such appeal is Central Excise Appeal No.26 of 2008. 2 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ther some money payable to Central Government under the Central Excise Act,1944 or the Rules made thereunder? (d) Whether the CESTAT is correct in observing that the condition precedent prescribed under Rule 5 of the Sugar Export Promotion Rules,1973 is not available as it is nowhere referred in the Show Cause Notice or the impugned order? (f) Whether the CESTAT is empowered to accord the `Exp....