Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (9) TMI 1473

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Suptd. (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per: Shri P. K. Choudhary The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of sponge iron, which are dutiable goods. The Ld. Consultant appearing on behalf of the appellants contended that during the course of manufacture of Sponge Iron, they use Iron-ore as a raw material. During screening of the iron-ore, fine particles emerge and they are cleared as i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand of Rs. 65,851/- alongwith interest and imposed penalty of equal amount for violation of Rule-6 (3) (b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. By the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Adjudication order. 2. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records. 3. I find that the appellants are using iron-ore as a raw material. The iron-ore i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Central Excise, Kolkata-III FO/A/76048-76055/2016 dated 21.09.2016 4. Union of India Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. 2014 (303) E.L.T. 321 (S.C.) 5. Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Gas Authority of India Ltd. 2008 (232 E.L.T. (S.C.). 6. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry Vs. Advance Detergents Ltd. 2015 (322) E.L.T 508 (Mad.) 7. Nirma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner o....