2017 (9) TMI 1468

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... B. Ravichandran (Technical Member) The appeal is against the order dated 27.07.2005 of the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs, Chennai. The appellant imported bulk drug called Micronized Progesterone BPand claimed benefit of concessional rate of duty under Sl.No. 80 (A) of the Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002. The Revenue contended that the appellants are not eligible for such con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tero Drugs Ltd. 2010 (262) ELT 490 (Tri.-Bang.) c. DR. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. Vs. CCE, Hyderabad 2010 (251) ELT 447 (Tri.-Bang) 3. Ld. AR for the Revenue opposed the appeal. He submitted that the goods imported by the appellants are in bulk form and they are not intended for retail sale. 4. We have heard both sides and perused the appeal records. 5. The dispute is between two e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e note that the product imported by the appellants is assessed as Micronized Progesterone BP. There is no dispute on this. The form of import being bulk, the Revenue contends that it should be under 80 (B). We note that the impugned goods covered by Sl.No. 58 of List 3 is specifically covered under 80 (A). In a similar set of facts, the Tribunal while interpreting identical entries for claim of co....