2017 (9) TMI 1315

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....us, ADC (AR)  for the Respondent. ORDER The facts of the case are that the appellants during 2002 - 2003 had undertaken job work for manufacture of -Steel Structures and tower components' as per the specification of M/s. Reliance Engineering Associates Pvt. Ltd., for telecommunication purpose.  The appellant was supplied both steel and lead free of cost for fabrication of 42 Nos. o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pheld the remaining part of the order of the adjudicating authority.  Aggrieved, appellants are before this forum. 2.  Today when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of the appellants Ld. Consultant, Shri P.C. Anand submitted that the appellants had not done the galvanizing process but that was done only by M/s. Hindustan Galvanizing.  For this reason the processes carried ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 5.1  Evidently the appellants have been entrusted with job work to fabricate the steel structures, namely, Base Trans receiver stations.  From the facts on record, it also emerges that the said fabricated structure was required to be supplied to M/s. Reliance Engineering Associates Pvt. Ltd., after galvanizing.  This being so, the entire processes undertaken on the steel and le....