Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (9) TMI 129

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as it stood before amendment, after the date prescribed in the said provision would relate back to the date of issue of the notice?" So far as the factual matrix of the case is concerned, the Revenue is in a worse position than that which obtained in CIT v. Lunar Diamonds Ltd. [2006] 281 ITR 1 (Delhi). Ms Prem Lata Bansal, learned counsel appearing on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the words "served" and "issued" are synonymous and are interchangeable. The Bench did not have the benefit of the decision of the hon'ble Supreme Court in R. K. Upadhyaya v. Shanabhai P. Patel [1987] 166 ITR 163, which in fact strengthens and fortifies the position that there is a clear distinction between "issuance of notice" and "service of notice". Ms. Bansal's reliance on Tea Consultanc....