2017 (9) TMI 837

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioner has challenged an order dated 13.5.2014 passed by the Government of India rejecting the petitioner's application for issuing notification under section 80IA( 4)(iii) of the Income Tax Act ("the Act" for short). For the ultimate view that we are likely to take, it is not necessary to record facts minutely. 2. Briefly stated, case of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espect to development and maintenance of an industrial park. Such issues were highlighted in the impugned order. Referring to two notices issued by the authority on 25.2.2014 and 16.4.2014, it was recorded that no response came from the petitioner and, therefore, the authority proceeded on the basis of available material on record. Case of the petitioner is that though there was no response to the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner's stand that communication dated 21.4.2014 was filed personally on behalf of the petitioner. In fact, the stand of the respondent is that no such communication is received. 4. Admittedly, the impugned order proceeds on the basis that in response to the two notices dated 25.2.2014 and 16.4.2014, there was no representation of the petitioner. Naturally, therefore, the documents accompanied....