Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (7) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sessed for the assessment year 1999-2000 and the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, who assessed the income, held that the assessee had reduced Rs. 2,00,000 on account of old stocks, but there was no justification to it. He, therefore, made addition of Rs. 2,00,000 while making the assessment. This order was carried in appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The appeal was allowe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the decision of the Commissioner is not on facts and it is only on the ground that the valid notice under section 143(2) was not issued before the expiry of the period of limitation. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the decision of the Assessing Officer was interfered with by the Commissioner and that is the order which presently survives. During the pendency of the further proceedings, o....