2017 (9) TMI 548

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Commissioner (Appeals) wherein he upheld the order of the original adjudicating Authority. The original adjudicating Authority had ordered as follows : "(i)  I confirm the demand of Central Excise duty of  Rs. 1,31,016/- (Rs. One Lakh Thirty one Thousand and Sixteen only) already paid vide GAR -7 Challan No. 50344 dated 29.03.2012 in the present case under proviso to Section 11A(4) ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Section 11A(1A) of CEA, 1944, (iv) I impose redemption fine of Rs. 50, 000/- ( Rs. Fifty Thousand only) under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 in lieu of confiscation since the goods are not available for confiscation, (v) I impose penalty of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) on Shri Vidhyadhar V. Muley, Authorised Signatory and Manager (Noticee No. 2) of M/s Bhagyalaxmi Steel Alloys ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eipt of the show-cause notice, under proviso to sub Section 2 of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, all proceedings stand concluded. In the written submission filed by the appellant they had relied upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh-I vs. Vikas Garg - 2014 (306) ELT 94 (P & H). They have also relied on decis....