Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (1) TMI 948

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....irst petitioner is a manufacturer of gold ornaments. First petitioner claims that the second petitioner is its employee. It is the claim of first petitioner Company that it effects large scale sale of gold ornaments to various reputed gold merchants and traders. It is further stated that it is an assessee under the provisions of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act. It is its further case that the gold ornaments are principally manufactured in West Bengal and from their stock, it was transferred to Chennai, and its further case is that the gold ornaments required in Kerala are usually stock transferred from Chennai to Cochin. 4. Case of first petitioner is that the goods sent from Chennai to Kerala through the second pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ther or first petitioner executing Bank Guarantee for 70% of the value of the goods and on both petitioners jointly executing a simple bond without surety for the balance 30% in favour of the first respondent." 8. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned Single Judge, the petitioners are before us in this Writ Appeal. 9. Shri T.N. Seetharaman, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, after arguing the matter for quite some time, may be knowing the mind of the court, would submit that the first petitioner shall deposit a sum of ₹ 24 lakhs for the present and that amount may be adjusted towards the tax liability that may be determined by the respondents either against the first or second petitioner and on such payment, ....