2017 (9) TMI 168

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondent ORDER ( Per : Honourable Mr. Justice Akil Kureshi ) 1. The petitioner has challenged the action of the department in showing an outstanding demand of Rs. 1,08,31,405/- for the assessment year 2006-07. The petitioner has prayed for a direction to be issued to the authorities to delete such demand as appearing on the e-filing portal of the department concerning the asses....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rote to the department on 02.03.2012 and pointed out that for the assessment year in question no scrutiny assessment had been carried out. No demand of outstanding tax was raised and the demand of Rs. 1,08,31,405/- be dropped. The petitioner sent several reminders on this aspect. 2.3 The department did not accept the petitioner's stand and uploaded in its e-portal the status of outstanding dema....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssment year 2006-07 under which the said demand can be stated to have arisen. In plain terms, the department is unable to produce any order giving rise to such demand. The department has not refuted the petitioner's contention that the return filed by the petitioner for the said assessment year 2006-07 was not taken in scrutiny and simply accepted under section 143(1) of the Act giving rise to ref....