2017 (8) TMI 1066

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e names are set out in the schedule at page no. 3. 2. Consequently, the Petition having been dismissed as abated, the request is to set aside that abatement and allow the substitution and thereafter, to restore the Review Petition for being heard in accordance with law. 3. There is an opposition on behalf of the proposed respondents. There is an affidavitinreply which states that there is no sufficient cause for condoning the delay. The enormous delay remains unexplained. The explanation allegedly set out in paragraph 5 does not inspire confidence in the sense the respondent was wellknown figure in the cinema industry. He commanded huge popularity and his death was widely publicized in the media. Therefore, the deponent cannot say that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missed on 14th September, 2011. The Department/ applicant filed a Review Petition seeking a review of the order of this Court dated 14th September, 2011. It is during the pendency of the Review Petition that it was discovered that the sole respondent expired. The Review petition, therefore, could not proceed. That is how this Chamber Summons has been moved on 8th September, 2015. 5. We have found from the affidavitinsupport that the reason is that there was a dispute about who would be entitled to succeed to the estate. To our mind, this understanding of the Income Tax Officer and who represents the Revenue, shall not prejudice the lager public interest and that of the Revenue itself. It may be that the Government officials, and particular....