2017 (8) TMI 875

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : B. Ravichandran, Member (T)]. - These miscellaneous applications are for rectification of error apparent from record in the Final Order No. 52590-52510/2016, dated 22-6-2016 of the Tribunal [2016 (340) E.L.T. 215 (Tribunal)]. In the said final order the Tribunal decided on the entitlement of two refund claims filed by the appellant. The refund claims also....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0-Cus. up to the date of issuance of said order but provisionally for a further period of six months from the date of issuance of said order. It was further recorded that the three Member Bench of CESTAT despite having set aside Notification 70/2010-Cus. ordered continued levy and collection of ADD at the rates prescribed in the said notification. The plea of the applicant is that three Member Ben....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the said Bench. The ruling of the said ADD Bench was only followed in the impugned order. However, the wordings has given a different meaning. Accordingly, we correct the errors in the impugned order as below : 3. In para 6 page 8 of the impugned order for the words "prescribed in" the words "as applicable on the day preceding issue of" will be substituted. Further, in the same para in page ....