2017 (8) TMI 789

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....R Mr. Sanjay Jain, D.R. ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 31.05.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals-I), Jaipur. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a service provider, engaged in providing Forward Contract Service, for which it is registered with the Service Tax Department. During the course o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bursement and since the appellant after collecting the same from its client had deposited the said charges with the Commodity Exchange, it cannot be said that Service Tax is liable to be paid on such charges by the appellant. He further submits that the proceedings initiated in this case is barred by limitation of time, inasmuch as, the period of dispute is from 01.04.2005 to 31.08.2006; whereas, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tes the findings recorded in the impugned order. 5. Heard both sides and perused the records. 6. On perusal of the impugned order, we find that the appellant has not produced any plausible evidence to show that the transaction charges cannot be included in the gross value. Further, it has also not produced Circular or Instructions issued by the NCEDX with regard to the application of the stock b....