2005 (10) TMI 55

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gency account No. II amounting to Rs. 7,10,824? 2. Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the accretion in the contingency account No. II could not be brought to tax as trading receipt in spite of the fact that the actual sales tax liability in respect of completed transactions had been duly provided for by transfer from the aforesaid amount? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the sale of vehicles under the hire purchase agreement is concluded only when the terms of the agreement are fully complied with by the hirer or option to purchase is exercised? 4. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83. The Department appealed to the Tribunal, which was dismissed. Another issue related to the claim of investment allowance on computer under section 32A of the Act at 25 per cent, on Rs. 4,24,567 being the value of the computer installed in the office premises of the assessee. The Assessing Officer declined to allow the said claim amounting to Rs. 1,06,142 as, according to him, it was an office appliance and did not fall under the provisions of section 32A(b)(ii) of the Act as it was not used for the purpose of manufacture or production of any article or thing and mainly was used for its own office work. Aggrieved, the assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) who allowed the assess....