Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (8) TMI 725

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....GEMENT By this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal seeks our opinion : "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in sustaining the deletion of Rs. 1,19,81,900/by the CIT (Appeals) on account of interest free loan given to Andhra Pradesh Rayons Limited? (ii) Whether on th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etween the parties that identical questions were raised for consideration by the Revenue in Income Tax Reference No.3/1995 relating to the same respondent/assessee. On 13th July, 2017 this Court by reasoned order decided both the aforesaid questions in favour of respondent/assessee and against appellant/Revenue. (b) Therefore, in view of the reason stated in the order dated 13.07.2017 in Income ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e raised in the present reference stands concluded in view of decision in Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. in I.T.R. No.75/1998 (supra). (c) In the above view, question No.3 is answered in the affirmative i.e. in favour of respondent/assessee and against the appellant/Revenue. 5. Regarding question No.4 : (a) Mr. Dewani, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee, very fairly states th....