2016 (7) TMI 1338

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the demand of duty along with interest has been confirmed and penalty of Rs. 50,000/- for violation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the period 6-9-2007 to 14-11-2007, the appellant has defaulted for payment of duty, therefore, as per Rule 8(3A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m the said order, the appellant is before me. 3. The ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that it is admitted fact that during the period, the appellant has defaulted the payment of duty in time but later on, the same was paid along with interest, therefore, if there is any violation that it is only procedural violation of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. In that circumstances, Cenvat credit....