2017 (8) TMI 602

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s Court, in the case of (BSNL Vs. Union of India) reported in (2006) 143 STC 91, which was later considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of (Idea Mobile Communication Ltd., Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Cochin) reported in (2011) 23 S.T.R. 433 (SC), wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as follows:- "13. It would be appropriate to mention that later on the said Escotel Mobile Communications Ltd. merged with the appellant company i.e., M/s. Idea Mobile Communication Ltd. The aforesaid decision of the Kerala High Court was under challenge in this Court in the case of BSNL vs. Union of India reported in (2006) 3 SCC 1. The Supreme Court has framed the principal question to be decided in those appeals ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sing authorities will have to keep in mind the following principles: if the SIM card is not sold by the assessee to the subscribers but is merely part of the services rendered by the service providers, then a SIM card cannot be charged separately to sales tax. It would depend ultimately upon the intention of the parties. If the parties intended that the SIM card would be a separate object of sale, it would be open to the Sales Tax Authorities to levy sales tax thereon. There is insufficient material on the basis of which we can reach a decision. However we emphasise that if the sale of a SIM card is merely incidental to the service being provided and only facilitates the identification of the subscribers, their credit and other details, it ....