Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (7) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T(A)-35 dated 30.06.2014 for the assessment year 2010-11 in the matter of order passed u/s.143(3) of the IT Act wherein Revenue is aggrieved for deletion of addition of Rs. 2,61,77,677/- u/s. 69C of the IT Act. 2. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. 3. Facts in brief are that assessee is a dealer in ferrous and non ferrous metals. During the course of scrutiny assessment, AO ob....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... above parties to substantiate his claim alongwith documentary evidences such as transport receipts, challans etc., However these parties were not produced before the AO. Accordingly, AO made addition of Rs. 2,61,77,677/- u/s.69C as unexplained expenditure. 4. By the impugned order CIT(A) deleted the addition after observing as under:- I have' gone through the facts. of the case. The main con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of showing the' evidence of actual' purchases and the sales being made on the basis of the said purchases and the source of payment not being in doubt and' neither there being any evidence noticed by the AO that any of the payments made by the cheques have been routed back to the appellant, the ratio in. the decision of Nikunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd of the jurisdictional Hon'bl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....art of the assessee to indicate that gross profit shown by assessee during the year was more or less at par as shown in the earlier orders, accordingly, he contended that addition if any should be upheld to the difference in GP @0.95% on the alleged bogus purchases of Rs. 2,61,77,677/-. 7. We have considered rival contentions and carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below. We had ....