Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (7) TMI 287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Singh, D.R. ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 27.01.2015 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Meerut. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant availed area-based exemption under Notification No.50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003. Upon completion of the period mentioned in the said Notification, the appellant started payi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on the Larger Bench decision of this Tribunal in the case of Spenta International Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2007 (216) ELT 0133 (Tri. LB). 3. The ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that though the capital goods were installed during the period of availment of exemption, but those capital goods were also used for manufacture of the excisable goods, on which, duty was payable w.e.f. 04.01.2014....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ring for the respondent reiterates the findings recorded in the impugned order and submits that at the time of installation of the capital goods in the factory, since the finished goods manufactured were entirely exempted from payment of duty, the case of the appellant falls under the embaro created in Rule 6 (4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and thus, benefit thereof cannot be available to the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....actured, which attracted payment of duty, as per provisions of sub rule (4) of Rule 6 ibid, Cenvat benefit is not permissible to the appellant. The Larger Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Spenta International Ltd. has held that cenvat eligibility is to be determined with reference to the dutiability of the final product on the date of the receipt of the goods or the date of utilization/eligib....