2017 (7) TMI 243

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s.Ruju Thakkar for the Respondent ORDER Per Court 1] The Appellant had preferred an appeal before the CESTAT along with the stay petition. 2] By the CESTAT order dated 16th April, 2012, the present Appellant was directed to deposit the dues as per adjudication order within four weeks. On the said date, none appeared for the present Appellant. The said order was not complied. The Appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ns, submits that to show the bona fide of the Appellant, the Appellant is ready to deposit 25% of the duty without prejudice to his right. The Appellant be given an opportunity to contest the matter on merits before the CESTAT. 4] The learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the Appellant is protracting the matter and is guilty of disobeying the order passed by the CESTAT. No plausible r....