2017 (7) TMI 121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ngi, Joint Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: C J Mathew Seven appeals have been filed by M/s Shringar Films Pvt Ltd against common order-in-appeal no.235-241/2006/MCH/JC/SVB/05 dated 27^th June 2006 of Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Customs House, Mumbai pertaining to the agreements between the appellant and various licensors of films that were dispatched to the appella....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order does not assign any reasons for upholding the decision of the lower authority and is a mere reiteration of the original order. The absence of any evidence to include the royalty and license fee, without investigation into the transmission of these amounts, is contended to be contrary to the requirements of law. It is also contended that there is no sale between the licensor and licensee and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Goods) Rules, 1988. Here, too, we find that the value has been declared for the limited purpose of assessment and is, admittedly, not a reflection of the transaction value. Considering the nature of the imported films, it is impossible to find a contemporaneous import for the purposes of comparison of assessable values. 6. It is seen that the impugned order has held that the value should be en....