Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1971 (11) TMI 45

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gainst an order of Manchanda J. dated November 11, 1963, by which he has reviewed his earlier order dated August 13, 1962, allowing Writ Petition No. 1558 of 1962 filed by the appellant. The writ petition was filed against proceedings for the recovery of arrears of income-tax and was based on the ground that the recovery proceedings were time-barred. In his judgment allowing the writ petition, Man....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the recovery proceedings were well within time. On the ground that relevant documents had been suppressed as well as on the ground that, on the basis of these relevant documents, the recovery proceedings had been taken within time, Manchanda J. allowed the review applications and dismissed the writ petition. It may be mentioned that, at the hearing of the review application, certain technical obje....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the review applications is the correct one. In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Shivdeo Singh v. State of Punjab it is now well settled that the High Court has power to review an. order made under article 226 of the Constitution. The appellant's contention that no review application lay is, therefore, without any force. In our opinion, the review application filed by the responden....