Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (6) TMI 802

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es, Ernakulam. The job work mainly consists of assembly of components into final product. These Kinetisers are after the job work are returned to the Bangalore office of Canan Technologies in bulk packing of eight pieces per box and thereafter they sold to M/s. Canan Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Ernakulam who in turn pack the Kinetisers in individual retail cartons and market the same. As per the intelligence report, the assessee has obtained Central Excise Registration and is not paying central excise duty on the branded excisable goods manufactured and cleared by them during the year 2001-02 and 2002-03. Therefore, the officers of the DGCEI conducted a search of the factory premises of M/s. Viswam Industries, Office premises of M/s. Canan Tech....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the dead person as it amounts to violation of the principles of natural justice inasmuch as the person who is proceeded against is not alive to defend himself. In support of his submission, he relied upon the following decisions: a) New Sharada Industries Vs. CCE 2016-TIOL-2022-CESTAT-BANG. b) Dhiren Gandhi Vs. CCE, Bangalore 2011 (266) E.L.T. 125 (Tri.-Bang.) c) CCE, Bangalore-III Vs. Dhiren Gandhi 2012 (27) S.T.R. 452 (Kar.) d) Shabina Abraham Vs. Collector of CE & Customs 2015 (322) E.L.T. 372 (S.C) e) MRs Bharati Mulchand Chheda Vs. CCE, Mumbai-V 2016-TIOL-694-CESTAT-MUM. f) Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. CCE 2014 (33) S.T.R. 332 (Tri.-Del.) 3.2. The learned counsel further submitted that as per Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedu....