2017 (6) TMI 162
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... is directed against the impugned order dated 10.12.2012 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) wherein the Commissioner (appeals) has rejected the appeal of the appellant and upheld the order-in-original. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in providing taxable services under the category of "Programme Producer's Service"....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ice tax deposited by the appellant along with interest and imposed penalty. Aggrieved by the same. the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner who rejected the appeal. 2. Heard both the parties and perused the records. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law because the appellant had paid ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... [2014 (36)STR 196 (Tri-Ahmd) 2) Bajrang Security Services Vs CST Ahmedabad [2010(19)STR 577(Tri-Ahmd)] 3) Sai Machine Tools Pvt Ltd Vs CCE &C Indore [2006(203)ELT 15 (MP) 4) Gokul Associates Vs CCE Surat [2013(30)STR 306 (Tri-Ahmd)] On the other hand learned counsel for the appellant has also cited the following decisions: 1) Garodia Special Steels Ltd Vs CCE Raigad [2015(38 STR 527(Tri-Mum)....