Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 515

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... No.2. P.C: 1. At the request of Ms. Cardozo, we grant time to file an affidavit in reply. 2. She has raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the writ petition by submitting that this writ petition challenges an Order-in-Original, dated 3.11.2017, of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Nashik II. 3. She submits that against this order, admittedly, an app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... excise duty. This issue is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of International Auto Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bihar, reported in 2005 (183) E.L.T. 239 (S.C.) and Motherson Sumi Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut, an Order of the Delhi Bench of CEGAT, affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Commissioner Vs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....elf, namely, Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not permit this course. 8. On 20.3.2015, Civil Appeal No.1996 of 2006 of the Revenue against this final Order of the Tribunal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court by a speaking order. Mr. Sridharan would, therefore, submit that on the uncontroverted allegations in the show cause notice itself and referring to a Job Work, the p....