Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 489

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hik, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER 1. Notice. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents accepts notice. 2. The short question involved in this petition is whether the Assessing Officer ('AO') was justified in declining the Petitioner's prayer that the percentage of pre-deposit for stay of the demand created as a result of the assessment order dated 23rd December 201....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a 4(B)(b) of the aforementioned OM which provides that wherein AO is of the view that the nature of addition resulting in the disputed demand is such that payment of a lump sum amount lower than 15% is warranted that is in a case where addition on the same issue has been deleted by appellate authorities in earlier years, the AO should refer the matter to the administrative Pr.CIT/CIT, who shall th....